Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit b706929f authored by ylvse560's avatar ylvse560
Browse files

Updated readme

parent 6c215228
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -140,8 +140,7 @@ Yes
Separable version: average 70ms with filter 21x21. 15ms speedup.
### QUESTION: Compare the visual result to that of the box filter. Is the image LP-filtered with the weighted kernel noticeably better?
![Box filter 5x5](Lab5/outbox.ppm)
![Gaussian filter 5x5](Lab5/outgaussian.ppm)
The Gaussian filter has a nicer look in our opinion. :-)
### QUESTION: What was the difference in time to a box filter of the same size (5x5)?
No noticeable difference in time. 90ms for both.
......@@ -194,4 +193,4 @@ CPU 0.082142
GPU sorting.
GPU 0.001693
The CPU is faster than the GPU only up til 1024 elements, after that the GPU is always faster. A parallelized CPU will run faster than the current version. However, the GPU will always beat the CPU on large element sizes, since the bitonic sort makes use of massive parallelism, which the CPU cannot.
The CPU is faster than the GPU only up til 1024 elements, after that the GPU is always faster. A parallelized CPU will run faster than the current version. However, the GPU will always beat the CPU on large element sizes, since the bitonic sort makes use of massive parallelism, which the CPU cannot.
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment