-
Thomas Bellman authored
We are about to include a piece of code which is a translation (from Python to Ruby) of code licensed under the normal GNU Public License (version 2 or later), and the translation is thus also licensed under GPL. While we could ask the original authors to allow distribution under the Lesser GPL as well, we instead choose to relicense this entire module under the normal GPL. Relicensing from LGPL v3+ to GPL v3+ is permitted in general, as LGPL is just "additional permissions" on top of GPL, and section 7 of GPL says: When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of it. See also https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-compatibility.html, where Richard Stallman explicitly mentions relicensing from LGPL v3+ to GPL v3+. (In addition, as far as I can tell, all the code remaining in this module is entirely written by me, and I can give myself permission to relicense.)
d6ecc36dThomas Bellman authoredWe are about to include a piece of code which is a translation (from Python to Ruby) of code licensed under the normal GNU Public License (version 2 or later), and the translation is thus also licensed under GPL. While we could ask the original authors to allow distribution under the Lesser GPL as well, we instead choose to relicense this entire module under the normal GPL. Relicensing from LGPL v3+ to GPL v3+ is permitted in general, as LGPL is just "additional permissions" on top of GPL, and section 7 of GPL says: When you convey a copy of a covered work, you may at your option remove any additional permissions from that copy, or from any part of it. See also https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-compatibility.html, where Richard Stallman explicitly mentions relicensing from LGPL v3+ to GPL v3+. (In addition, as far as I can tell, all the code remaining in this module is entirely written by me, and I can give myself permission to relicense.)
Loading